MNS vs KNL, page-164

You continue to postulate without making any substantive contribution to the thread. Stating your opinion is fine, however many of your comments are being stated as fact, and that's not okay.

Completely separate beasts. Enviro and Mining licences don't involve throwing around hundreds of millions of dollars. Good luck with that one.

A common misconstrued stereotype. Ask any German, it is not efficiency, but precision for which they are known. Precision to a fault sometimes. This leads to extensive red-tape and bureaucracy. The end result is perfectly accurate, but it's not always the fastest outcome.
http://www.dw.com/en/germans-and-bureaucracy/a-16446787

The same banks will not be going over Magnis' BFS. Not KfW in any case. Regardless, an even cursory glance at the BFS will show any potential lender that Kibaran will in all likelihood be able to sell its product and repay the loan, whereas Magnis is unlikely at present to be able to sell enough of its product to repay the required loan (based on binding sales contracts).




I find it amusing that nobody is responding to my quite serious questions. Got no answer?
I'll try once more.
Given the state of the graphite market, and the nature of non-binding Chinese MOUs, who is Magnis going to sell anywhere near 220ktpa graphite concentrate to? Show me the market, because as far as I am aware, it simply doesn't exist.

I'm more than happy to see you all here if you're going to contribute to the discussion, however slanting a company without any substance to back up your insults is not achieving this.
Slanting a company's shareholders, and gloating about returns is disgusting behaviour, and has no place here.

If you will not back up some of your claims, please leave the KNL forum.