Share
clock Created with Sketch.
28/04/16
16:40
Share
Originally posted by groundzero
↑
"It's amazing that so many people witnessed him carry out the shootings, even at a very close range, that there are now people saying that he could not have done it, "
Hi w2b, was all a long time back, and everything was done to death back then, to no avail whatsoever, mate.
Havent the time right now to go back through it all, but just a couple of things evident from posts in this thread.......
Seems that those who had the closest contact with Bryant were NOT called as witnesses or to identify him. That includes a guy shot through the throat face to face by Bryant and finished up in the same ward in hospital. They would not allow him to look at Bryant upon request, and he was not called as a witness. Why? A positive ID by him would have ended all speculation even today, eh? Very strange. And a woman from the cafe was not called as a witness either, who had been close as.
Then again,some witnesses said the shooter had a "pockmarked face"...................and nobody wanted to know.
There was forensic evidence that the police evidence video could not have been taken on the day of the shooting, but must have been taken the day after.......or more strangely, the day before. One could go on and on.........
All strange and inconclusive.
A well written article in a link from a link in this thread concluded that the event was obviously staged, but emphasising there was no complicity by John Howard or the Australian Govt. And thats it from me for now....
GZ
Expand
GZ--Not allowing witnesses' to have any contact with MB, was legal protocol, witnesses' not being called was because they were not required because MB pleaded guilty, the biggest flaw in all this is , there was no motive for an conspiracy .....
This thread is closed.
You may not reply to this discussion at this time.