Ann: Notice of Meeting/Proxy Form-SRT.AX, page-186

"Malmanu's style is poor, yes. But consider two sides of the fence."

______

Mal has style ? Now I've heard it all.

It's one thing to "have a point". No one objects to listening to a well thought out and politely put counter-opinion. No one !

What Malmanu supplies is not even close to this. He dredges up any word or phrase that he can find in official literature and either twists it's intent (thus misrepresenting its meaning and attempting to mislead the less well versed readers here) or only tells half the story (such as the fact that "experts" doing such valuations are not supposed to include any "projections" or "promise for the future" in their very bland low-base evaluations). Cold hard evaluations are thus constructed as the norm and rarely representative of the eventual outcome in EITHER direction.

If you watch closely you can even feel the "tone" of each of his posts is the same.... a snickering, leering attitude of "what else can I say to pi$$ these people off".

He, unlike others here who from time to time will point out the potential downside of a stock, has zero credibility among those who know him.

It's no coincidence that some of the more moderate and open-minded types on here have Mal on ignore. It's mostly only the ambulance chasers among us (like myself) who can't tear ourselves away from watching the pitiful wretch at work who still read him.

All the above is of course ITOOMOUH (In The Opinion Of Most Of Us Here)... oops I mean IMO.

.