Go Team BRN, page-109

If you really believe you are holding shares in a revolutionary new technology then you have nothing to fear from my posts.

Now if professor Krichmar et al were to publish something (anything!) on BrainChip in this publication, for example, would that be BS?

I am 100% sure that the recent ‘significant’ milestones reached by BrainChip, a ‘revolutionary’ new technology, will not get a single mention in that very relevant publication that professor Krichmar is co-editing. But if it did get even the slightest mention, I am 100% sure that you and your followers would be singing it from the mountaintop.

But what does it mean when three professors endorse a ‘revolutionary’ new technology Down Under but have nothing to say about it publically (as in interviews, articles, conferences and publications etc) Up Over? I have no reason to question their integrity; they have excellent reputations. But I would like to be reassured that their endorsements are not just marketing dressed up as science. I would like to see a proper academic paper published. And I would like the pros and cons of the tech explained to me by impartial experts and not by a bunch of ... 'gentlemen' on a stock forum.

All imo.

Btw, I am doing you a favour.