So you are arguing that no "retard" (as defined by who?) can say he is Guilty of a crime???????? How exactly are "retards" going to be differentiated between non- retards. Where is the line to be drawn. hmmmm very very close to retard must go to trial, whatever he pleads, whereas no, just tipped across to the "non-retard" line You can plead Guilty. Who on earth would take on the responsibility of working out who is and who is not a retard, mogga? The law deals in attempting to be fair and reasonable. To base a law on a retard and non-retard distinction, with a different law for each of these, really are you kidding????
