Magnis funds Uranium company, page-4

Hi Robbo, yes it's an interesting issue on whether Nuclear is green, I suppose it's the risk of potential catastrophic pollution if/when something goes wrong than causes the issue.

Re why people may have been suggesting that, well according to PAppillons post from discussions after the EGM

"6. FP regards it as ‘quite exciting’, and a pity for MNS not to be still involved...but ‘the main reason we have divested is that basically our potential graphite end-users said if you’ve still got those lumps of uranium we ain’t signing anything... "

Disclaimer, I unfortunately was unable to attend the EGM so cannot verify the accuracy of comment, though believe @Trommel may also have confirmed the statement.

Which then brings me back to the question I raised, given we appear to be funding the Uranium company, are we far enough removed. In some ways funding one sounds worse than owning dormant assets.

Thanks