It's really not that hard to quote correctly - You press the button once.
Your argument was not the effectiveness of the disposal which is a seperate statistic nor the positive or negative nature of it. It was about the 'definition' of a disposal. The argument was that more disposals is better which you disagreed too. It was not about disposal efficiency or effectiveness of disposals which again are seperate statistics.
Player A
Disposal: 38
Goals: 0
Disposal efficiency: 97.4%
Player B
Disposal: 1
Goals: 0
Disposal efficiency: 100%
These two players who both played in Round 9 for the exact same team achieved these statistics. According to you both players should receive the same praise because 'more is not better' except that one was the highest scoring player in AFL for a round whilst the other was dropped to the seconds. More disposals is better.
I noticed you also ran away from the other argument about Chad vs Eddie too when you were wrong, and resorted to the same pant pulling down fallback. You're not an Adelaide Crows supporter? Oh! Right! You were a Melbourne Football club who we tore apart on the weekend, equally as embarrassing club too. No wonder you're so whiny and upset tonight.
