Wise heads needto prevail, page-96

I have never said that Celgene extended the ROFR because they needed to raise capital. Never.

Also I had hoped that the nasdaq listing would lift the SP, but I hadn't banked on the hostile environment and the very aggressive shorting and downramping that was conducted there.

I didn't say that the CEO was on his knees begging for Teva to reconsider.

Nor did you, but why don't you pursue the person who said it? It's inflammatory and emotive and entirely supposition.

The insults that are directed at the CEO. You don't correct them either. They're inflammatory and rude.

But you rate me zero for value added? Listen you're very keen indeed to discredit me, but ignore other posters who make excessively negative claims. They're all ticketyboo as far as you're concerned.

but I get this:

the same drivel from you that has permeated these threads for years.

It's difficult to know what to do with this kind of thing. If you engage with to counter the negative and nasty posts you can get confused with the people making them.

The sheer volume involved, as it's all coming from posters who are negative on the stock...can weigh you down. But that volume doesn't make them any more correct.

You can keep on trying to insult me, and I will resist that characterisation.

Try having a go at someone else...surely you can't be lost for candidates who really do write drivel? Oh they're ok..they're being negative...that's ok!