Good and Bad and/or funny?
Quote:
I’ve done away with the old product pricing plan and have implemented a new one which is a combination of licensing fees, one time on premise setup fee (non-existent in the original plan) and have added 4 levels of varying features that increase the solution’s price depending which feature set the customer chooses. This has had no effect on the existing platform architecture and adds additional revenue layers to the solution. END QUOTE.
Interpretation:
The old model was never going to work. As a start up company it was to ambitious bordering on
pie in the sky pie in
CZyber Space Stuff.
We had also forgotten to apply a set up fee which wasn't smart.
We have set up 4 options, which will allow the end users to pick the cheapest option they possibly can, thus reducing early potential revenue but will kick start us.
(I wonder how much of a gap there is between these levels...it is VERY Important).
No effect on existing platform architecture....(AND why would it? - I cant see how)
Adds 'additional revenue layers' to the solution?? (Aye what...more options = less money?). This statement is 28,976,356 kms from saying 'increasing revenue'.....(ie, revenue layers does not necessarily mean increase revenue, clever but tricky wordplay).
Side note:
The mentioning of a phase 2 contract, in no way mentions contract for cash consideration...contact as in agreement, yes. Could just of easily been called Trial 2....or second attempt.
Watch the wording....some people can just be far to clever for their own good
I think they will get there eventually.
I will wait at 1.6 cents (unchanged Price to buy more)
