Share
17,783 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 9082
clock Created with Sketch. 27/06/16
17:50
Share
Originally posted by benelong
↑
You criticised my servile attitude as a shareholder. It was about my "appreciating" that MS had answered my email. Normal, courteous discourse. Nothing to do with Teva or finances or use of capital."so for you say that you are appreciative of a mere response to an inquiry that you made concerning YOUR company is quite astonishing". You are telling me that I should not preface my reply to MS with the usual "thanks for your reply"?"Many believe that Mesoblast has an obligation to make a formal statement to the ASX confirming unambiguously that Teva withdrew for strategic reasons unrelated to the phase 3 trial and that they had no trial data of any kind that could influence their decision. I agree with public comments that the conference call of 14 June did not adequately address these points. Your assurance to me is appreciated but the failure of Mesoblast to clearly, unequivocally and publicly state the same unfortunately confirms in many minds that Teva's withdrawal was because trial data was available to Teva and/or Mesoblast. Public confirmation or denial of that view is necessary ." "Oh, but I do stand by my words". Then stand by them with direct reference to any words that I used."Such servile shareholder attitude is so 1980s." I told MS that he (as MSB) has an obligation and that confirmation or denial is necessary . No "please" or "if you would be so kind". Just do it MSB. Hardly grovelling language. You obviously fancy yourself as a wordsmith so please illustrate precisely where in my communications with MSB they are justified.
Expand
On the matter that is overwhelmingly the substance of my posthttp://hotcopper.com.au/threads/ove...ading-further-south-si.2798137/#post-18131228 ),
(20min delay)