Share
clock Created with Sketch. 21/08/16
17:13
Share
Originally posted by samcro
↑
Sorry but in my opinion - evolution is not my assumption. My respect for Science is greater than blind faith because Science is REPRODUCIBLE. I can repeat the same Scientific process and get the exact result every time if I follow the correct methodology. Hence - Science is logical but Faith is based on assumptions. Sure theoretical physics and the more high-leveled stuff are really more "deductions" but from my own personal experience in the lab (I have worked on tratuzumab both in a joint study with a post-grad uni lab and the research wing of a hospital) I trust facts and results that can be reproduced. In fact, I relied on this "reproducibility" heavily since tratuzumab or commonly known as herceptin is a very effective breast cancer medication and rest assured when I say that my Science got this drug to the patients that needed it much more than simple beliefs in miracles. If someone you know has an illness - you can pray all you want but guess what - it's the scientist behind the medication that will help them. So yeah Science can't explain certain things but mate, if I believed in miracles and took your stance on things, maybe Herceptin wouldn't be on the PBS and thousands of Aussie women wouldn't be alive today.
Expand
Samco.as an example,we can observe changes within a species,variations within a species,variaties of cats,dogs,birds this is observable fact and science.Birds coming from dinosaurs is not observable.repeatable,testable,this is where science leaves and asumption and belief step in,but people still call this science,it is not,it is accepted by faith and is a belief.
