Thank you. So lets explore this a bit further (logically and sensibly).
If testosterone creams and gels are highly absorptive, how does the second point really matter? Why not dab it somewhere else? Away from the misus. And surely other things like deodorant could get in the way under the arms?... Conversely if underarms are so absorbent, why are chemicals allowed under arm anyway? Obviously there is way more to this scientifically than at first appears. So I'd like the facts. Was the selling point "for use under the arms" simply originally a marketing ploy anyway? And if so, given this apparent negative ruling, why not change direction where it is applied?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
And surely other things like deodorant could get in the way under the arms?... Conversely if underarms are so absorbent, why are chemicals allowed under arm anyway? Obviously there is way more to this scientifically than at first appears. So I'd like the facts. Was the selling point "for use under the arms" simply originally a marketing ploy anyway? And if so, given this apparent negative ruling, why not change direction where it is applied?
(20min delay)