"If any other Company was sniffing around HDR, you can bet Mr Potter will know. So as he sold yesterday we can as you say take it that at yesterdays date nobody else is showing an interest."
You seem to be suggesting Mr Potter sells or holds on the basis of priviliged information not available to 'the market' i.e. you and me. Isn't that insider trading, and if so, does it contravene anything in HDR's code of corporate conduct (not to mention the law of the land)?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- HDR
- potters payout in part
HDR
hardman resources limited
potters payout in part, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)