Does that same logic extend to the take up of warrants, Jim? In your scenario, the banks must have thought S&G didn't have enough cash to pay the total arrangement fee so some proportion had to be taken as equity?
Otherwise, why double up with some equity on already risky debt?
Banking Syndicate Approval - What has changed since?, page-17
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)