There is no point? this is what people are supposed to be calculating in the first place.
and yeah thats a 10% growth yoy, which as i mentioned before is below BKLs average yoy growth rate....
what im saying is the stock is worth at the very least 110.
if you ran this same process with "way over 200" numbers, then you realize that their revenue would have to increase dramatically over a 10 year span, which imo, is not worth paying for today.
at this point i am definitely long on this one so instead of questioning my reasoning, come up with an argument of the company's worth your self instead of giving me criticism. because neither you or me would pay over 220 for this company right at this moment.
at least i hope you woudnt...
125 is on the table for next week and then 140 by December IMO!!
DYOR
IDKA
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BKL
- the new under the oldrse
the new under the oldrse, page-47
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 123 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)