1PG Chart, page-324

Thats about as close to facts as I have seen you post in ages....most of the time you chase parked cars and bark at anyone who offers a view contrary to yours.

Let me give you some basics, spelled out by someone ages ago.

They don't have a disruptive technology, they barely have a differentiator.
They have no cashflow and are churning through contributed funds.
They are AU listed which in itself indicates a lack of confidence in listing in their own market.
Their Board is frankly "lite".
Their market capitalisation is and has been for some time so far out of whack with some fundamental ratio analyses. Dont botther with this is different and this is how tech stocks work..it isn't and they dont.

It is tech punt at best, that somehow (and this one beats me) it got to $5. It is dying and has been since it has had to release its financial performance (which it has done with great reluctance it would seem) and in a peacemeal fashion to obfuscate reality.

It jumped out of the blocks when it first started and punters all followed kungfu panda to their own detriment (yet again) so save me from ill-conceived and poor comparisons, me-toos and what-ifs....they are grasping at sad and sorry straws of the mythical faith.

If it manages to survive in its current form it will be a miracle. Bit like getting hit by lightening whilst holding a 9 iron in the air.....at least you will understand that part of my response....back on ignore me thinks...cheers.