article on petroleumnews.net, page-8

Acamas,

As I said - your interpretation - and you are entitled to it - and I would defend your right to that as vigorously as I could.

You must sometimes concede though that it is your interpretation and yours only - and I am sure there are plenty who would share your interpretation - just as there would be as many more that wouldn't.

You have a way of stating your interpretations as if they are gospel - we just need to keep an open mind until we have facts.

All I will say is that

"It is understood that Hardman had been talking to at least two other companies ...."

is journalist speak for unsubstantiated claims (believe me I know).

Good luck to you.


DYOR