Triggs facing student defamation suit, page-34

  1. 31,278 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 4
    watso seems to recall that the details of the freedom of information request to the AHRC, in relation to the students, had previously been made available into the public domain.

    in a promo about leigh sales, sales claimed that she did her research prior to interviewing anybody - so maybe she did not do her research all that well, and really just gave triggs a soft interview, so triggs could stand, unchallenged, on her soap box.

    watso watched the interview, and when it was mentioned that there were 20,000 cases per year, watso's very first thought was - wow, that seems a bit high - and immediately equated that to about 2000 cases per year in west australia - and that is per year... why didn't sales, as an experienced interviewer immediately question triggs over this patently irrational number.

    it seems that it is the QC, who acted for the students, who has written to triggs to explain herself.....mmmm a letter that triggs will need to respond to
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.