Sileach on notice!, page-27

And a shame it wasn't all just left on the patented K-max banner owned by PWN which Adrian Griffen is a foundation member and a member of the board but he got greedy and ruined the karma of cooperation for the common good which he would have personally benniritted financially as he is a major shareholder possibly in the top 20 and even recently received new shares at 3 cents as remuneration but now LIT's Sileach will even have a problem with today's announcement that MIRIWA w,I'll be but already have anyway be joining cooperating with ANSTO at the miniplant in regards to refining the cash generating from the removal of contaminants to what's wanted in lithium ie fertilisers etc which could clash with PWN's patented K-max unless patent royalties are only cheap anyway and it's great that these impurities can be removed and on with game changing and not just to cost of lithium proccessing including silicates or mica as PLP like to call it which could not be proccessed until K-max and then L-max came along which was really the intellectual property of Strategoc Mettallurgy which is now PLP and put together by Adrian Griffen who need to be working in harmony with ANSTO and MIRIWA !!!
There's only one question left, it is stated that Sileach can proccess all forms of silicate so does that include spodumene ? so no need to separate the two otherwise it may now become cheaper to proccess silicate of which there are many abundant different forms of aswell as cash generating byproducts !!!
As for LIT even with all of Western Australia which is confirmed and two other juristictions by mutual consent or just pay patent royalties which anyone can do under patent law ? as above just leaves does all silicates mean spodumene aswell and what will the patent law judge rule it as ? (k-max ?)