don't know why, page-10

Oh gominer...you are not making any friends...tell me what ppl you know that are involved in LUM apart from those that hold shares that you have taken a personal dislike to....?
I beleive you have no idea about who the management is of the co and you know nobody that does...nor are any of your brokers involved in the co eg sponsoring.
You state the co is BS...i suggest you do some research before making outlandish comments like the above.
Unlike VCR who have to break into the market and get some deals going LUM is on the verge of erecting the largest neon picture screen of all time in what is known as the world capital.
There are a number of other companies into artificial hearts...I beleive a German co is at the forefront of the industry at the moment...not VCR.
LUM has a product that has been tested and works...they are not currently undergoing trials.
The market that LUM is breaking into(15 bill pa) is larger than the market VCR is trying to break into.
LUM already has significant partners involved unlike VCR.
The market cap of LUM is almost 10% that of VCR and LUM is making money unlike VCR which is currently losing 6.5c per share p/a.
LUM is set to announce a multitude of deals in the near future whereas the best VCR can announce is that the trials of their product are succesful.
There is no other protype of LUM's technology that can come close to it...they are the co with worldwide rights to their product unlike the heart market where there are loads of companies into similar types of tech nology...some arguably better products than that of VCR...show me a co with a better product than LUMs in the same field.
There are no risks involved with LUM...its just a matter of the deals rolling in...the product works...if something happens to a patient using VCR technology you will see massive dump in price...you yourself have stated this.
I could go on and on about the advantages of being a LUM shareholder than a VCR shareholder but I think you get the point..if you wnat to argue which co has the least amount of risk involved and the most potential I'll be happy to take the argument up with you.

I suggest you just concentrate on promoting your own stocks rather than trying to demote others stocks because you have taken a personal dislike to shareholders.

Im sure people are aware of how you tried to drive down the price of VCR with constant bashing of the co and the risk involved only to turn around a week later and say you are a major shareholder.
Looks like you are trying to do the same with LUM...Im sure lummettes agree we dont need the likes of yourself on board or any other of similar character.

Anyway time will as to how well LUM will perform...will you eat humble pie??