No idea what is going on with all this. Board appeared upbeat, but no guidance in terms of the tech use, and vague information as to for what sales OBj receives revenue. So the question is whether any royalties where the SKII product is not sold with the wand or whether only royalties where is sold with the wand. I know this was discussed previously, but if PG is rolling out the same product outside Asia without the wand, then how is OBJ supposed to receive income? If anything could be presumed that PG cornered the tech through the PDA, accomplishes it's goal to improve visibility and sales via the promo releases, then pulls out of bundling the wand at no cost to itself, leaving OBJ with no income or recourse since tied up in a 10yr contract - and that contract is not visible to holders so anyone's guess at the agreements included.
Just putting the other side of the coin out there for comments. Since signals are very mixed, PG reticent to comment or allow Obj to comment, no info on unit production or sales, and a market that maintains on pushing prices down.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WFL
- SK-II R.N.A. POWER - US launch
SK-II R.N.A. POWER - US launch, page-18
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 22 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable