Ann: First Quarter Results On Form 6K, page-115

Yes correct HT he was talking out of his hat.

Teva did not have the right to review is participation right at the start. Teva could only walk if the threshold or recruitment targets were not met.

That agreement was changed. And the new agreement was announced in the 3rd quarter financial.

The market understood exactly what it meant. Teva could walk if they felt like it.

SI definitely tried to under play the significance. The brokers tired to argue there was nothing to worry about. They truly did not believe Teva would walk. Hence being completely blindsided when they did.

The rest is history.

I can’t believe I entertained the idea that Teva saw those thresholds and then walked.

Its ridiculous to think SI lies, goes to bed each night and prays no-one on HC finds the original agreement and then complains to SEC.

Because if he is caught he, the other Directors, Teva, everyone else in on this conspiracy all go to jail for 5 years.

But there is a funny side HT.

Your last 200 posts claiming Teva saw the thresholds are wrong. And the other 200 posts that because the thresholds failed then the trial is more likely to fail are also wrong.

But your posts that the P2 results are shaky I think are spot on and Teva walking speaks directly to this issue. The spotlight shines more on those now in the absence of thresholds.

But this was Colliers original idea from 5 years years ago. It all began going wrong for you when you started creating your own new material.