So you don't think there is anything after you die?, page-364

  1. 29,348 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 3
    "You keep applying a personal or humanist connotation to illness, disease, natural disasters. The personal or humanist aspect is in the long term scientific advances that will eventually give us control over most human maladies."

    I think the opposite is true. I see nature as independent of personal or humanist applications. I think that you are applying personal constraints on nature by attempting to restrict it to sort of "Higher Order, an external, non physical reality that is cognitive, purposeful" because you say you can't imagine an alternative - well, I think that is what you are saying (I could be wrong). This has been the human solution to the mysteries of what confronts them as far back as we able to assess it. You say that you "don't propose an Intelligent Guide, Intelligent Design" but is the "Higher Order, an external, non physical reality that is cognitive, purposeful" not an Intelligent Guide/Designer?

    The above is for me a dilemma that I fail to understand in your beliefs.

    "Like you said, it doesn't matter who is right or wrong, reality is untroubled there by."

    But we still exchange ideas on reality which is all good.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.