Intentions questioned, page-88

bruceyg

Your problem then is either comprehension or wilful misrepresentation.

However, moving right along to your previous post about Trump's right or due diligence to investigate government agencies early in his Presidency ... he has that right and would be careless not to.

But these investigstions appear targeted and not part of a multi agency investigation.

Is it the role of the U.S. President to represent and prosecute policy for a majority of Americans or is it the President's role or right to force his views and will on Americans ... no matter the topic ... no matter the outcome?

The gender equality examples I raised were about ending violence against women and enabling more equal career and financial outcomes ... It wouldn't be a great outcome to see such programs axed or cut back.

Not acting on or participating in the unresolved issue of potential induced global climate change is not something America should embark on unilaterally on the whim of one man. For the record, I am yet to be convinced induced global climate change is real.

And for the record during the election I don't ever recall posting an opinion of which candidate might win. Agreed, I did post of my concerns about Trump's announced policy positions and how he campaigned. My concerns are yet to be proved unfounded.

Dex