Hi there Monster. I confess I inadvertently misled readers on the date of the article. It came up as 13 Dec 2016 on my screen-search, but on re-checking, I see it was published in Dec 2015. I agree with you it is still a 'nice article' - I would say a 'great article' - but arguably less impactful given the passage of time. Thank you for pointing out my error.
