Ann: Wangle Suspension Update, page-156

Here are some interesting tidbits:

• VPN providers are not the underlying carriage. Wangle is running over actual carrier's infrastructure. The interception law clearly states application to carriers only. That the regulation was seen as necessary to comply with and not contested at all was a misstep by management and an overstepping of boundaries set in the legislation by the AG dept as the only compliance required is by the WAN carrier Wangle are utilising, not Wangle itself. See part 187A clause 3 of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Act 2015.
• It is untrue that VPN subscription purchases must be made through Apple's in-app purchase technology. I have used 4 different paid VPN providers, all with IOS apps, all of which payment was made on the providers website. PIA, VyprVPN, NordVPN and the generic OpenVPN app for a Romanian mob I forget the name of.