chart , page-5

I agree Ithaca. Profittrader has said it all before and I have long been wondering about the relative value of each for GA/Heathgate/Quasar. It is hard to understand why the market has underestimated GIR's potential for an in situ mining extension, even if the grades are not as good as AGS's and the drilling priority is lower.

{I don't believe though that Quasar would be spending 14m this year on AGS tenements (and a director topping up) if they weren't seriously interested in the AGS discovery so far}. So why not both - AGS and GIR ? GA can afford. The demand exists.

GIR has great management, has looked after its shareholders well, and of course has "position, position, position" in SA - and elsewhere.