Ann: Quarterly Activities Report & Appendix 4C, page-163

Yet have been proven correct time and time again. This stock is in a perpetual downward trend. If a "new holder" (one of those people you think shouldn't listen to contrary views) came along six months ago, what would they have been told if they read:

At no time did I say they should not listen to contrary views - incorrect

"YOUR POSTS: This is a great investment and about to make holders some serious money"

At no point have I said this hwich is why you didnt quote a post number, you just made up words to suit your position. - incorrect

"As at now, would they be in a better position if they listened to you or to me?"

"as at now" - Time is the Judge of this one - Lets just let this play our before you claim who people should or shouldnt have listened too.

All most people on here bring to the table is an eagerness to learn an share their research from the hard work they have done on the company they own - you shooting down every single person or post that has any positive implication is bordering on insanity and is unhelpful to everyone involved.