SUV 4.00% 5.2¢ suvo strategic minerals limited

Ann: UltraCharge Q&A Insights, page-16

  1. 118 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 4
    Yeah i get the concept and thankyou @moppo for the table. And on the surface it does look good. My concern is that batteries to commercialise generally take a lot of investment. I'm trying to understand whether titanium oxide is the next big thing (i.e. similar to what graphite was). I have read that graphene which is different to graphite significantly improves lithium batteries. I'm trying to understand whether using titanium oxide would be more beneficial than using a graphene substitue on current lithium batteries.

    Maybe I'm doing circles - anyway I do like the technology, i know a bit about mineral sands and I think this could be a good thing. The questions though are:

    1. how long to market.
    2. will it be superseded.
    3. how much to get to market
    4. what does the patent actually cover - i.e. will spin offs be excluded and then the battery technology is somewhat redundant.

    Just some questions if anyone has opinions.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add SUV (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.