Robbo
The difference beteen your posts and mine are the fact that I post concise views based on verifiable facts, and offer an unbiased opinion.
In contrast, you ramble on over 30-40 lines in fantasy land, dreaming of what "could be". (I had to laugh at your comments about Man being the biggest..., but couldn't be stuffed correcting you).
I welcome you to challenge me on the accuracy of any of my posts.
As an aside, I was the only poster that could clarify all of the misinterpretations of the pending rights issue ( I note you didn't comment - was it beyond you?) - to the point the company was forced by the ASX to issue a restatement of the new issue pricing. The statement confirmed my allegations the original press release mis-represented the facts. Now I wonder what/who prompted the ASX to jump on ITE over the issue????????
I welcome you to challenge me on anything I post on ITE (or any of my other posts for that matter), where you consider I may factually wrong.
Meantime I will continue to post on ITE from an objective, non-biased point of view.
If it upsets your rabid attempts to ramp ITE so be it.
ITE
i.t.& e limited
