Lawyers Weekly, page-16

Thanks Brad, I came across this in one of Grant's recent posts and am by no means disputing this.

What's disingenuous is for SWC to write a post and implicitly refer to someone whilst explicitly stating he/she isn't referring to them. It is sneaky behaviour and does everyone a disservice.

I think we are all grown up enough to deal with Grant's conflict of interest. At least he has disclosed it whilst everyone else operates under anonymity.

Has anyone disagreed with any of the information or analysis he's volunteered?