I have pointed out your porkies zzedzz, but you choose to ignore. As for Svenmark, I will find the idea convincing if it ever satisfies the criteria of consistently agreeing with observational and experimental evidence, not on the basis of it agreeing with it. Do you think otherwise, or do your politics compell you to support the idea?
As for the flat Earth being the consensus of scientists, that's just another of your porkies. Maybe you should make statements based on the science instead of your ideology.
