I hope you are right, but for an originating proceeding to be heard and determined within 27 days from filing, I think will be difficult. That will likely depend on the state of the court list in WA and how quickly the Plaintiff’s legal team moves. I do agree that AVZ will be successful in that matter.
It was reported in a Business News article on 8 March that;
“MMCS acted promptly to appeal the unlawful revocation of its Manono licence and this remains subject to proceedings in the administrative section of the DRC Supreme Court of Justice.”
I concede that there has not been any actual evidence of an appeal in DRC that I have seen and so perhaps there is no appeal. I hope there isn’t. If there was an appeal, my very limited research indicates that the Conseil d’Etat (Administrative Division of the Supreme Court of Justice) seems to be the highest court for administrative matters in DRC. If that is the case, it will be very good news if/when it is dismissed in that court. I will be very impressed if all this is cleared up in 19 days but if it takes a bit longer, I believe it will be worth the wait.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AVZ
- Ann: Manono Project Licence
Ann: Manono Project Licence, page-195
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AVZ (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
AHK
ARK MINES LIMITED
Ben Emery, Executive Director
Ben Emery
Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online