the day sinosteel stole the show, page-6

Hoots yr right but this is weird. Sinosteel are not responsible for defects.? This is absurd, why would a company allow a $300 million process plant to be built and then waive the defects with no right to sue Sinosteel. There are Australian laws that make this waiver null in void. The process plant can not put more than 20% of its contracted volume though it. The trade practices act cover this type of scam. I know that CDU are deep in litigation but all self inflicted. In a month or so maybe all academic.