That's fair enough. I'm just trying to put myself in the thick of the situation - by doing so, I can imagine a very convincing argument backed by third-parties that evidence indicates improvements in technology will increase yields and survivability rates even better than the numbers in the model. The improvement in these numbers yoy could be construed as evidence the expected high yeilds will come from later plantings. This is exactly what the crux of FWs response was to Glaucus. If there is any truth or half-truth to what he's saying I suspect it would be used to entice any serious bidder who really wants the trees.
In short, I've yet to fully rule out a buyout as a potential scenario. I think people still have time to see what unfolds before the company experiences a credit event.
The report from Reuters about the KKR buyout before market open has yet to be disputed. I can't help but wonder why that is.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- QIN
- Isn't KKR the obvious bidder?
Isn't KKR the obvious bidder?, page-23
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 30 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add QIN (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SBW
SHEKEL BRAINWEIGH LTD
Dani Nadri, Country Manager Australia
Dani Nadri
Country Manager Australia
SPONSORED BY The Market Online