good results gold, page-8

Hey Guys,

On a second read I actually think this announcement is better than initially thought. I still concede there is a lot of information missing to say that it is very positive. The reporting is prelinary however everyone has to get beyond what was not reported and look at what has been reported.

Keep in mind that 12 groups had results "UP TO" 69 ppb. This means that it is very likely that some of these twelve had results exceeding the 69ppb minimum.

I agree that it would be great to know positions of the results as per the map. The results may have been a straight 1.2k result. It would also be helpful to see what the results of the 12 groups which had a minimum of 69ppb were ie 69, 89, 70, 69, 130 etc.

Anyway I stand by my comment that this is a good result however very preliminary.

I am the Iceman!