266 percent increase in net operating cashflow, page-2

A bit more can be said.
Revenue static when compared with Q2 and Q3 2006 (ave 140 mill) - forget Q4 and flood impact. Therefore growth may have stalled.
Secondly, cashflow looks good but a few % points difference in timing of payments can make that look good. What is there actual profit? I'm a little concerned that they haven't reported this when they were very quick too (simultaneously) with test entity reports of Q2 and Q3 which were good results. Doesn't necessarily indicate a problem but why haven't they reported this time?