Actually, having read your hyperbole I think it is you who has the edge when it comes to imagination. You know full well that that is not what I meant...ah well, back to misinterpreting my posts instead of answering the real question of how much revenue has the "first technology" announcement produced in the intervening three years? Why would this new announcement be any different to the 2014 version and produce different results given that the "first technology" was such a raging commercial success (as the company would have you believe)? Surely these are important questions that need to be answered, especially for one so "heavily invested". Three years should be long enough for any company to give its investors some idea of the revenue expected from such an announcement - or is the current minuscule revenue what it is and is it the expectations that have been over-inflated? It's funny how you have never questioned the imagination of those posters who have predicted revenues in the tens of millions (and even hundreds of millions) over the last three years.
OBJ Price at posting:
6.7¢ Sentiment: Sell Disclosure: Not Held
(20min delay)