''No, again that is imposing the attributes, rules and limitations of creation, on the Creator and limiting what He can or cannot be.''
Except it doesn't have anything to do with a Creator, which is an unknown entity (to make a positive claim of knowledge in relation to an unknown entity is merely an assertion).
This problem in logic is related to the given terms and conditions made by the claimant; complex things must have a creator. If it is claimed that universe, life, etc, could not form or exist because such complexity can only be created, the logic must necessarily apply to all complex entities, including a creator. To claim exemption for the so called solution to complexity, the creator, by the rules of logic, is begging the question.
So, on the contrary, to say that all complex entities, the universe, life, species, etc, must have a creator but the creator is eternal is imposing your own rules of logic in a flawed attempt at establishing a case for the existence of a creator.
