I understand precedence, in the MZN v KDR case then a 60 year old case is useless same with a 50, 40, 30, 20, 15 year old case, things have changed regarding emails, remember when fax's came in how good it was that you didn't need to have to send the original document?? Fax's became a legal document in the end, emails have done the same now.
How this case will work out is anyone's guess, nobody has the facts apart from the core group involved.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?