Creation and Evolutionary theories are both inadequate.
Intelligent design answers a lot of question which both theories fall short.
Ideas such as -
The study of DNA provides powerful new evidence that life is the product of intelligent design.
It is difficult to imagine how such a complex organ as the human brain could have simply evolved."The probability of life originating from accident is comparable to the probability of the Unabridged Dictionary resulting from an explosion in a printing shop."
Darwinists claim that the reptile-to-mammal evolution is well documented. But for reptiles to evolve into mammals at least some of these transformations must have happened:
• Scales had to have mutated into hair.
• Breasts had to have evolved from nothing.
• Externally laid eggs had to evolve into soft-shelled eggs that were nourished by an umbilical cord and placenta in a womb .
Complex functions like vision and digestion are performed by intricate biochemical molecular machines. If one part were to evolve in isolation, the entire system of interacting parts would stop functioning; and since, according to Darwinism, natural selection preserves the forms that function better than their rivals, the nonfunctioning system would be eliminated by natural selection - like the fish with lungs. Therefore, there is no possible Darwinian explanation of how irreducibly complex structures and systems came into existance.
A very interesting topic worth lots more thought and research.
- Forums
- General
- science rules
science rules, page-20
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 78 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)