science rules, page-36

As far as science goes, we really do not need old faked up, gravity-only, closed cosmological models that simply thrive on absurdity after absurdity and all shrouded in nonsensical mathematics delivered by high priests like Einstein, Hawking, Davies, Smoot, Mather, even Dawkins. We see an entire zoo of invented fictional entities and forces tossed to the media .... such as a speck appearing instantaneously from nothing, an expanding universe or is it inflating, black holes, dark matter, dark energy, accretion disks, ultradense objects, gravity warping of space-time, "visions of God", string theory, multiples of dimensions, time travel, etc, etc.

For myself the default hypothesis will always be an infinite material universe not as some closed or set of SYSTEMS but as a connected whole ENVIRONMENT. Why? Well the idea of nothingness is just that, an idea because no part of the universe can be devoid of matter ..... the best idea is that nonexistence is impossible and indeed we live in an infinite universe.