Great read about EMH, page-130

At the risk of agreeing with Barwood, the company made a decision. A number of posters here are ventilating that decision and suggesting what management should have done. Those posters may or may not have all the relevant facts. Even if they do (very doubtful), suggesting what management should have done does absolutely nothing to assist in the analysis of the investment value of the stock. Management is not about to say "you know what, we've read some comments by posters on HC with f* all expertise and who are in possession of only some of the facts and we've decided to go with the processing method they suggest, despite the experts we've engaged, the work we've done and the money we've spent".

Still this debate on HC goes on and on with no point or objective other than winning points in a pi$$ing contest and no appreciation that it does not affect anything. They remind me of flies bouncing around and around inside a jar.

Rather than bemoan events which will not change, how about offering views (of all flavours) which assist in assessing the current and future value of the stock and only suggesting management do things which are actually doable (like improving communication).

This stock has good prospects and the electric revolution is imo going to accelerate. Predictions from competent analysts keep showing a steeper and steeper demand outlook for batteries as time goes on. Good luck to all long term holders!