domum, thanks for those links.
In the icewine #1 report they note a significant conventional target in the Kuparuk interval. Any idea why there is no mention of this and apparently no testing of this target with icewine #2?
From the IW#1 final drilling update:
"In addition to the unconventional HRZ play, a number of conventional reservoir targets were tested by the drilling of the Icewine#1 well with the following key highlights:
o Excellent reservoir was encountered over the Kuparuk sands interval from 11,262’ – 11,320’ with elevated gas readings over a 58 foot gross interval
o Preliminary log interpretation of the Kuparuk sand interval indicates porosities of up to 15% and good permeability
o The reservoir quality in this Kuparuk sand interval is substantially higher than anticipated, which is extremely positive for deeper conventional prospectivity on the Project Icewine acreage
Ann: Icewine 2 Drilling Update - Total Depth Reached, page-42
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 38 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add 88E (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $57.86M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.2¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.2¢ | $2.871K | 1.430M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 237 | 229711066 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3¢ | 542559084 | 199 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 09/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| 88E (ASX) Chart |