Ann: Change in substantial holding, page-28

E.g. 'greater chance of $100m revenue by the end if the year than going under'. What the???

You might not understand.. but the there is NO chance of them going under like Billy tries to suggest with manipulative negative posts.
Obviously 100m revenue isn't a chance either, but they will get there well before there's any chance they get near going under.

It would be nice if there was some chance of me being paid, but I can't imagine any company ever doing that!

You sell/non held downrampers just talk it down for the sake of it..
Some of us holders READ ANNOUNCEMENTS, and trust what they tell the market.. Just because you refuse to accept they might actually be making the progress they suggest in updates, and are actually closing in on significant results.
Why don't some of you haters actually find out some more about them, instead of sitting there bagging out a company you don't hold or know a thing about?

It's interesting how the Nor thread especially is full of angry ZIP, XPE, FRX holders, talking down NOR when they don't hold the stock..
Yet when you look at ZIP, XPE and FRX threads.. you don't see NOR holders chiming in talking it down.
Better class of holders.

Keep blatantly talking it down Henry, and others..
NOR will either prove you lot, or me wrong as this quarter closes out.
I will be sure to give you all a shout out