comparable flares..., page-30

T4 I have read almost every post you have forwarded regarding GDN. Your research until now had a positive bias.
Ok you turned your back during the most scornful rebuttals which disappointed me given that it was and remains at this point in time absolute conjecture as to where this stock will go but I must say I admired your resolute disciplined approach to such a high risk play.

Afterall surely the most thorough analysis should offer some reward. At least provide enough evidence to render the negative posters null and void.
But no. You now have or at least appeared to succumb to the nay sayers.
This is strange. Afterall until the results of flow testing one has or should not have any strong opinions one way or the other.
There are so many examples of poor initial readings that have provided staggeringly successful results and visa versa.
If one were to look at statistics wildcat strikes could easily be compared with junior gold explorers. 1 chance in 100.
But GDN appears to be different.
I wouldn't offer any strong opinions just yet. If GDN wanted to exaggerate the flare it could have easily done so.
Stick to your reseach and do NOT allow the negs to soil that good work.
You know the negs are playing the percentages. Most times they will be proven right. But their arguments are shallow. You know that.

Thanks mate. From my side your work is gratefully accepted and stands up to scrutiny.

cheers,
walt.