andrewe and sue12 r my heros, page-18

What argument?...

I posted an assessment based on the likely uranium spin-off value...and gave clear and precise supporting argument.

If there is opposition to my assessment...simple, show me where I am in error?

Since my first uranium spin-off "hypothetical", we have since been given more details from the company of how it may look...from which I have compiled yet another more recent spin-off value scenario.

Interestingly, the second shows more value than the first...but both are more or less similar in terms of potential market cap.

I stand by those numbers 100%...and will do until I see something to refute them!

Now please...someone...anyone...show me where Andrewe, or anyone else for that matter, has given a decent counter argument to my numbers based on anything even remotely classified as substance?

I would love to have a decent, non-personal, non-egocentric discussion with Andrewe based on factual interpretations of the data to hand...that is after all what sites like this are for...sadly however, I suspect he is not up to the task.

For that matter...I respectfully ask anyone on this site...ANYONE AT ALL...to seriously look at my value equations for the uranium spin-off...and clearly point out where I am in error...or why the numbers do not stack up.

And please...tangible comments, from adults...we have seen more than enough fluff on these threads to last a lifetime.

So I issue this challenge...now is your big opportunity to actually prove yourselves...to value the spin-off before the event...and not as armchair experts afterwards!

Just remember to providde some facts while your at it!

Cheers!