ASX Today, page-7649

Also remember the HRZ numbers are based essentially upon a uniformally thick shale bed of approx 200'. This could be "up to 800' thick in places. Or even more.
That's over 4x thicker than the ice 1 core. Although the seismic is indicative, it is not necessarily accurate in its HRZ dimensional predictions. Add a thicker HRZ and the HUE and potentially, in certain areas, the Kupurak and you have not just a stacked play with 2 shale targets, but potentially a multiple layered/stacked play with a variety of different targets throughout the strata from around 10,000 ft and below. We are not in a position, nor is there sufficient reason to test these layers, but they will certainly come to light at some point when evaluations are being finalised in the future (all going to plan).
Now add a shallower conventional target/source to that and you have an array of value adding possibilities.
Step one, integrity of the shale structure and ability to remain open under frac conditions.
As you have mentioned d, suppressed decline rates will be a real sweetener to the flow rate if successful.

Only days to go until the HRZ's true behaviour and characteristics are revealed.
Extraordinary times. For 88E, Burgundy and I believe also for the USGS who, from an academic point of view, will be no doubt fascinated to see how this geological structure 11000+ft below the surface behaves.