I'll help you out, try searching for a formula called Net Present Value. It is the basis of valuating a company based on revenue - expenses and then projected to the end of the project life. So if you want to say I was "completely wrong" then you are actually arguing against a fundamental valuation concept that has long existed on the market for investors.
Also it's "you're" and not your. I cannot fathom why you might think you are going to be correct about complicated market valuations when you can't get primary school grammar correct. And yes I think there's correlation between grammar and stock analysis.
