Ann: Initial Results From Humaspunco Drilling, page-112

I don't know the reason exact reason why I am not a geologist, but I would say most reasonable geologists would have expected the veins to extend below surface to some depth, not just evaporate this result was bad to the extreme, far worse than I think anyone could have predicted based on that amazing sampling they complied, not only did thickness seem to evaporate grade did aswell to the extreme.

Another issue no one has touched on is the core logging we see mention of "mineralised veins", mineralised with what exactly? like I said many times in here, there was no zinc in there if there was you would see the zinc sulphides in the core pictures.


So not only did we have the company reported "mineralised veins" that came back as near blanks we even had a 6m mineralised vein completely evaporate between logging and assaying.

I will be very careful with my words here as the company has in the past called up and had me banned from hotcopper, in my opinion the core logging was verging on being......, if someone called it....... I would agree with them, that now has me asking was the sampling all ......???

You will have to figure the.... out yourself I will be gone for a month if I fill it in.

So what has gone on here I don't know exactly, because we aren't on site we don't have access to all the information, what I do know is the company isn't giving an explanation for it they aren't addressing where the "6m mineralised vein" disappeared to what happen to the other shrinking veins aswell.

That is something they should they love to pound the good sampling right down people throats, but can't give a decent explanation when something bad comes along poor form.